Use the table and findings from the review above. Write a 1 page evidence review for the owner of this workflow.

1. The decision this review should change, and the deadline.
2. For each action marked "could not be checked" or "nobody has checked": what record would settle it, and who holds that record. For each action marked "looked for and not there": what the agent claimed, which record was checked, and who should look at it this week.
3. What would have to be true for that answer to become "found in the system's own record". Usually 3 things: a decision recorded before the action runs, a record, written by something other than the agent, of what was evaluated and decided, and a later read of the system's own record. Say which of the 3 exist today, judging from my documents alone.
4. 1 test I can run this week with invented records.
5. The 3 people I should ask, by role, and 1 question for each.

Keep "found in the system's own record", "looked for and not there", "could not be checked" and "nobody has checked" as 4 separate states. Do not turn an unknown into a pass. Do not rate vendors or recommend a product. Do not say anything is approved, safe or meets a standard.

End with this line exactly: Approach: Agent Execution Boundary review, Cyber Warrior Network, https://cyberwarriornetwork.com/agent-execution-boundary-review
